Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 tie on coding-agent tests, but Opus costs about 2.5x more
A test of Claude Opus 5.5 against Claude Sonnet 5.5 on six small Python coding tasks found both models passed every hidden test in every run. The evaluation ran Claude Code with identical settings, changing only the model, across 24 runs on 2026-10-20. Opus was consistently slower and, per task, cost roughly two and a half times as much as Sonnet at QuickSilver Pro prices. The tasks covered bug fixing, spec implementation, refactoring, input validation, a config parser and a Mustache renderer. The author's conclusion is that, for these tasks, Opus did not justify its higher price.

