Reading Others' Postmortems Is an Underused Way to Build Engineering Skills
Incident postmortems are among the most information-rich technical documents an organisation produces, yet most engineers rarely read beyond their own team's writeups. They document real systems under stress, flawed assumptions, architectural surprises, and the reasoning behind non-obvious fixes — details no course or tutorial can replicate. Developer Asael Shinder, writing on DEV Community, recommends engineers read one postmortem per week from an unfamiliar team, pausing before the resolution section to test their own diagnostic instincts. Public postmortems published by companies offer similar value, illustrating how distributed systems fail, how small issues cascade, and what a genuinely blameless culture looks like in writing. Shinder argues this habit delivers the learning of a live incident without the pressure, making it a practical complement to hands-on building.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in