Python retrieval pipelines for support content should enforce crawl boundaries
The article argues that a retrieval system for a customer-support knowledge base should treat crawl boundaries as a data contract and an incident boundary rather than a single allowlist. It recommends fetching only approved source classes, preserving document and section citations, and quarantining material with unclear ownership or freshness before indexing. The author notes that robots.txt is guidance rather than authorization, so applications still need their own scope and access checks. Each chunk should carry its source URI, revision, section path, visibility class, and fetch time so citations point to the exact text behind an answer. The piece includes a Python example that checks host, path, publication state, and visibility before content is chunked.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in