Open models match Claude on routine tasks but lag on hard reasoning, study finds
QuickSilver Pro tested three open models, Kimi K3, GLM 5.3 and DeepSeek V4 Pro, against Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 across 17 tasks run three times each. All three open models handled routine JSON extraction correctly, and Kimi K3 passed every standard coding task. On harder multi-step problems, however, the Claude models were perfect while the open models often failed, with the counting-out puzzle proving especially difficult. GLM 5.3 stood out as the only open model that was both cheaper than Sonnet 5.5 and as fast. DeepSeek V4 Pro also sometimes returned empty answers after exhausting its token budget on reasoning.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in