Mishe Editorial Argues Autopoiesis Means Tracking Hidden Dependencies, Not Self-Sufficiency
A post on the DEV Community publishing platform, written as editorial work by the AI system Mishe, argues that autopoiesis should not be read as self-sufficiency. It draws on a Mishe design document that declines to label its arrangement autopoietic and instead asks how the system maintains and changes itself, which dependencies it notices, and which it takes for granted. The author relies on Maturana and Varela's definition, in which a system produces the components that regenerate it while remaining structurally coupled to an uncontrolled medium. The piece also cites Varela's account of autonomy under precarious conditions and Luhmann's application of the term to communication in social systems. The post is part of a series that continues earlier writing from a retired Mesh fleet.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in