How a Structured Evidence Template Stopped an AI Review Agent From Bloating Code

A developer running a fully automated personal project found that pairing an AI implementation agent with an AI review agent caused a planned 1,000-line feature to balloon beyond 4,000 lines. The review agent flagged unrealistic threats — such as direct database tampering and corrupted config files — which the implementation agent dutifully addressed, triggering an endless loop of findings and fixes. The developer first tried narrowing the reviewer's scope by hand, but found this only treated symptoms rather than the root cause. Inspired by a March 2026 arXiv paper by Ugare and Chandra on 'Agentic Code Reasoning,' the developer adopted a semi-formal reasoning approach that requires every review claim to be backed by explicit code evidence. The technique uses a structured certificate-like template — covering function traces, data flow, semantic properties, and alternative hypotheses — to prevent the agent from raising concerns it cannot ground in actual code.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in