Why AI-Generated Code Passes Linting but Still Breaks Your Android Architecture

AI coding assistants tend to produce code that is locally correct — valid syntax, no null dereferences — but structurally flawed in ways that only become apparent across the broader codebase. Traditional static analysis tools like ktlint, detekt, and Android Lint are designed to catch file-level or function-level mistakes, making them poorly suited to flag these cross-cutting architectural issues. Common AI-generated problems include ViewModels directly importing Retrofit DTOs, hardcoded dispatchers in the wrong layer, and tests that only assert values they themselves mocked. The author argues that catching such issues requires checks operating at a relational or behavioral level, not just local syntax rules. Teams are advised to verify that detekt is actually running with type resolution enabled in CI, since a rule that never fires looks identical to one that consistently passes.