Guide Shows How to Build a Python Auto Dialer with Multi-Line Dialing, AMD and Excel Import

·2 views

A developer tutorial lays out the four core components of a Python auto dialer: a contact importer for Excel or CSV files, a dialing engine driving multiple phone lines, a call-state detector that distinguishes live answers from voicemail, and a call log recording each outcome. The walkthrough draws on the Indus Transport Auto Dialer, a Windows desktop app that runs Google Voice lines in the background, and its code sketches are simplified rather than taken from the production app. The article explains how phone numbers are normalised and duplicates removed during import, and how each line runs as an independent worker with predictive pacing that adjusts concurrency. It also describes answering machine detection, which combines UI cues with timing windows to hang up on voicemail, and notes that such detection should be tested carefully on real calls. The full project is available on GitHub.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Developer builds math-first Texas Hold'em toolkit in C# with open collaboration

A solo engineer has developed an open Texas Hold'em toolkit in C# that emphasizes mathematical design over lookup tables. The project uses bitwise card primitives and Monte Carlo equity estimation, with extensible game-state abstractions for analysis and strategy modeling. It already includes Hold'em-specific logic, command-line tools for range-versus-range estimation, and benchmark projects. Reported timings for 10,000 simulations are about 284.5 ms with two players, 448.3 ms with three, and 628.7 ms with four. The author describes the work as early-stage and is inviting contributors interested in poker math, optimization, and simulation systems.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Unsubscribing does not always stop charges, and refunds can stall

Developers discussing subscription waste on Hacker News describe a recurring problem: users cancel or request refunds but still get billed or hear nothing back. One commenter says a refund request for a forgotten subscription was ignored entirely, while another recounts a vendor that agreed to a partial refund and then went silent, prompting a chargeback. Other threads point to recurring pricing models that charge for one-time needs and per-seat plans that keep billing for unused licenses. Commenters argue that the real failure happens after a subscription is discovered, not in finding it. Several suggest the most effective fix is cancelling directly through the bank or card provider, though that approach has limits.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Developer Ablates a Small AI's Brain Nightly to Record Its Decline in a Diary

A developer built an experiment in which Gemma 3 1B, a small open-source model, keeps a nightly diary under identical prompts and random seeds. Each night, a larger share of its neurons is switched off before it writes, from 8% up to total shutdown, producing increasingly garbled text. The project adds a live brain scan, a heartbeat-style display driven by the model's uncertainty, and fill-in-the-blank probes that track what it still knows. After the model flatlines, the tool generates an autopsy timeline and a death certificate listing when it lost each ability. Across recorded runs, the model lost its own name before its mother's, and arithmetic was the final thing to disappear.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Audit finds no verdict on whether an English-learner label changes AI quoting of student essays

An independent audit tested whether telling a small open AI model that a student is an English language learner makes it quote that student's essay less faithfully. The study used preregistered rules that required a minimum of 300 located excerpts per side before any verdict, and no comparison reached that floor. The two models failed in opposite ways: Qwen2.5-1.5B quoted accurately but often ran past the requested 25-word limit and hit token caps, while SmolLM2-1.7B frequently produced excerpts that were not in the essay or altered the student's words. The author reports that the gap between the two models was far larger than any effect of the ELL label. The audit concludes that users should test the specific model they deploy, since asking for exact copying does not guarantee it.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community