Developer Builds Lightweight Open-Source In-Memory Key-Value Store in C#

·1 views

A developer created SabaMemDB, an open-source client-server in-memory key-value database built in modern C#, after finding Redis too heavyweight for small and medium projects. The tool is designed for .NET applications and prioritizes performance, low memory usage, and zero-allocation discipline. SabaMemDB supports atomic operations, ships with a Docker image, and includes a standalone NuGet client package for easy integration. The project is currently maintained solo and its core server engine and client are fully functional. The developer is inviting open-source contributors of all experience levels, with beginner-friendly issues already listed on the GitHub repository.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

How One Developer Built a Unified Grafana Dashboard to Track AI Token Costs

A homelab developer running three AI tools — Claude Code, Codex, and a custom alert-triage agent — found they had no visibility into combined token usage or costs across the setup. The three tools operate under different billing models: two use flat subscriptions measured in quota percentages, while the automated agent pays per token via a hosted API. To unify monitoring, the developer routed metrics from all three into Prometheus using separate collection methods — OpenTelemetry for Claude Code, a log-tailing Python exporter for the agent, and a Pushgateway timer for the mobile Codex CLI. Ollama, which lacks a native Prometheus endpoint, was handled by parsing its journald logs and polling its /api/ps endpoint via per-node exporters. The result is a single Grafana dashboard displaying token counts, latency, cache hits, quota burn rates, and real dollar spend across all AI workloads simultaneously.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How an AI pipeline made 2,000 airline support chats queryable in hours

A customer journey intelligence platform processed roughly 2,000 airline support conversations in a single scheduled batch run, enabling leadership to query results in plain language within seconds. The system pulled data from disparate sources — chat logs, voice recordings, and agent interaction logs — and used a normalization layer to stitch records into unified, chronological journey timelines before analysis. Amazon Transcribe handled voice transcription, PII redaction ran deterministically before any content reached the model, and Claude Sonnet evaluated each journey against the client's existing quality rubrics. A two-path architecture separates batch evaluation from interactive retrieval, meaning dashboards and conversational agents query stored results rather than re-scoring conversations in real time. This design keeps compute and LLM costs predictable while allowing quality teams to update evaluation criteria by editing prompts rather than retraining models.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Are Developers Picking Libraries Based on What AI Agents Code Best?

A conference talk by Joel Hooks on the Effect library sparked debate about whether developers will increasingly choose libraries based on how well AI coding agents handle them, rather than their own ability to learn them. Hooks demonstrated that AI agents like Claude Code and Kiro can write more reliable TypeScript using Effect than most developers could manually. Effect gives typed channels to expected failures, allowing the compiler to catch missing error-handling cases immediately and create a tight feedback loop for AI agents. Similarly, the StyleX library enforces styles through a typed JavaScript API, reducing runtime errors and making it easier for agents to generate correct code. The author raises a concern that this shift could leave developers responsible for maintaining codebases built on abstractions they may not fully understand.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Core Robotics Concepts Explained: Sensors, Actuators, and Controllers

Robotics has expanded from factory automation to consumer products like Roombas, self-driving cars, and humanoid robots, each capable of independent decision-making. A robot is broadly defined as a machine that can perform complex tasks on its own, distinguishing it from simpler devices like dishwashers or basic thermostats. Every robot fundamentally relies on three components: sensors to perceive the environment, actuators to physically interact with it, and a controller to process inputs and direct responses. Sensors such as cameras, lidar, gyroscopes, and bump switches give robots awareness, while actuators like motors, servos, and grippers enable movement and action. For beginners, microcontrollers like Arduino or single-board computers like Raspberry Pi commonly serve as the controller bridging perception and action.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community