CiteWise Uses an LLM for Search Hints Only, Not Verdicts, After a Scoring Bug
The developer of CiteWise, a tool that checks whether academic references point to real papers, initially let an LLM guess at missing citation fields and then scored real papers against those guesses. This allowed plausible but incorrect citations to be marked as verified. The fix treats the LLM output strictly as search hints, scores all candidates against the user's originally parsed input, and only replaces the first search result when the second scores strictly higher. The update also retired the POSSIBLE_HALLUCINATION status, since failing to find a paper does not justify that claim. The author additionally found that treating empty search results as a clear outcome was flawed, prompting a rethink of how not-found and insufficient-evidence cases are distinguished.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in