SShortSingh.
Back to feed

Carhartt, UK Airports Breached: Why You Should Verify 'Client-Side Only' Tool Claims

0
·1 views

Carhartt suffered a data breach exposing 12.9 million customer records — including names, emails, and addresses — while Manchester Airports Group lost Wi-Fi signup data across three UK airports, both incidents linked to server-side data storage. These breaches highlight why users should scrutinize privacy claims made by web-based tools like JSON formatters and Base64 decoders that promise data never leaves the browser. Verifying such claims takes roughly 30 seconds: open the browser's DevTools Network tab, use the tool, and check whether any POST requests carry your input to an external server. Tools that genuinely process data client-side will show no such outbound payload, though third-party services like analytics may still make separate, unrelated requests. The core principle is straightforward — data that is never transmitted or stored cannot be exfiltrated, but users should confirm that for themselves rather than rely on footer disclaimers.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Rapid AI Model Releases Expose Memory Loss Flaw in Context-Based Agents

A model known as 'ox-alpha' on r/LocalLLaMA was officially identified on August 26 as GLM-5.3-Flash, a 320B parameter mixture-of-experts model released under the MIT license. The reveal highlighted the accelerating pace of local AI model releases, with Qwen3 shipping five versions in just 36 days between July 19 and August 24. Developers argue this rapid churn creates a recurring cost for AI agents that store memory in a model's context window, as every model swap requires re-tuning prompts, retesting tool calls, and re-ingesting curated context. To address this, a tool called Uteke stores agent memory in a local SQLite and vector index that any model can access via MCP or CLI, keeping memory intact across model changes. Its developers report a 42ms median recall time across 10,000 memories and a Recall@5 score of 0.946 on long-horizon benchmarks.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Unity_access Plugin Adds Screen Reader Support to Unity Editor with New Features

A developer has spent the past two to three weeks building Unity_access, a plugin designed to make the Unity Editor compatible with screen readers, particularly NVDA. Recent updates include a new Assets Viewer that lets users browse, rename, move, and delete project files, addressing a longstanding accessibility gap in the Editor's Project Window. An Options Menu, accessible via Shift+F10, enables users to perform object-level actions such as duplicating, parenting, and creating Prefabs — a key Unity feature for reusable game objects. Additional additions include a basic Console for reading logs and errors, a scene creation tool, an accessible Project Settings window, and a Build Profile window for managing project builds. The plugin is written in C#, available on GitHub, and the developer is actively seeking feedback from blind game developers and experienced Unity users.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Browserslist Targets Have Little Effect on Next.js JS Output, Tests Show

A developer experiment compared three near-identical Next.js projects configured with different browserslist targets — IE 11, Chrome 116, and Chrome 139 — to see whether the build output would differ. Using a TypeScript function that relied on modern JavaScript features like optional chaining, logical assignment, and ES2022 array methods, the team compiled each project and compared the emitted chunks. The IE 11 build was genuinely transpiled to ES5 by Next.js's SWC compiler, stripping arrow functions, replacing let/const, and rewriting modern syntax as older equivalents. However, the Chrome 116 and Chrome 139 builds produced byte-for-byte identical output, with no syntax downleveling applied despite the two-year gap between those browser targets. The findings suggest that Next.js's SWC compiler does not meaningfully differentiate between modern browserslist targets beyond a broad modern-versus-legacy threshold.

Carhartt, UK Airports Breached: Why You Should Verify 'Client-Side Only' Tool Claims · ShortSingh