Unity_access Plugin Adds Screen Reader Support to Unity Editor with New Features

·3 views

A developer has spent the past two to three weeks building Unity_access, a plugin designed to make the Unity Editor compatible with screen readers, particularly NVDA. Recent updates include a new Assets Viewer that lets users browse, rename, move, and delete project files, addressing a longstanding accessibility gap in the Editor's Project Window. An Options Menu, accessible via Shift+F10, enables users to perform object-level actions such as duplicating, parenting, and creating Prefabs — a key Unity feature for reusable game objects. Additional additions include a basic Console for reading logs and errors, a scene creation tool, an accessible Project Settings window, and a Build Profile window for managing project builds. The plugin is written in C#, available on GitHub, and the developer is actively seeking feedback from blind game developers and experienced Unity users.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Rapid AI Model Releases Expose Memory Loss Flaw in Context-Based Agents

A model known as 'ox-alpha' on r/LocalLLaMA was officially identified on August 26 as GLM-5.3-Flash, a 320B parameter mixture-of-experts model released under the MIT license. The reveal highlighted the accelerating pace of local AI model releases, with Qwen3 shipping five versions in just 36 days between July 19 and August 24. Developers argue this rapid churn creates a recurring cost for AI agents that store memory in a model's context window, as every model swap requires re-tuning prompts, retesting tool calls, and re-ingesting curated context. To address this, a tool called Uteke stores agent memory in a local SQLite and vector index that any model can access via MCP or CLI, keeping memory intact across model changes. Its developers report a 42ms median recall time across 10,000 memories and a Recall@5 score of 0.946 on long-horizon benchmarks.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Browserslist Targets Have Little Effect on Next.js JS Output, Tests Show

A developer experiment compared three near-identical Next.js projects configured with different browserslist targets — IE 11, Chrome 116, and Chrome 139 — to see whether the build output would differ. Using a TypeScript function that relied on modern JavaScript features like optional chaining, logical assignment, and ES2022 array methods, the team compiled each project and compared the emitted chunks. The IE 11 build was genuinely transpiled to ES5 by Next.js's SWC compiler, stripping arrow functions, replacing let/const, and rewriting modern syntax as older equivalents. However, the Chrome 116 and Chrome 139 builds produced byte-for-byte identical output, with no syntax downleveling applied despite the two-year gap between those browser targets. The findings suggest that Next.js's SWC compiler does not meaningfully differentiate between modern browserslist targets beyond a broad modern-versus-legacy threshold.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

A Practical Network Debugging Checklist for Faster, Smarter Troubleshooting

A developer has published a structured checklist for diagnosing network issues, aimed at replacing the common but unproductive habit of vaguely blaming the network without systematic investigation. The guide recommends first verifying whether the destination service is actually running, since a crashed process and a broken network can produce identical error symptoms. It then prioritizes DNS resolution checks, identifying stale or mismatched DNS as a disproportionately frequent root cause of apparent connectivity failures. The checklist further covers basic reachability tests, firewall and port blocking, latency and packet loss measurement, and the often-overlooked problem of asymmetric routing where traffic flows in one direction but not the other. The structured approach is designed to save engineers from spending significant time debugging the wrong layer of the stack.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Passing tests don't guarantee correct code — mutation testing exposes weak AI patches

AI-generated code patches can pass an entire test suite without actually being correct, because the test fixtures themselves may be incomplete or never designed to catch edge cases. A three-phase evaluation approach is proposed: first run property-based checks using invariants against random inputs, then apply mutation testing to fixtures to confirm they can actually detect failures, and finally freeze any flaky tests only after the first two phases succeed. The method is illustrated with a C++ interval-merging example where two assertions — one checking no range is lost, another confirming no overlaps remain — catch bugs that golden fixtures would miss. A Python script accompanies the approach, automatically mutating fixture data and flagging any test that still passes after the change as dangerously weak. The core argument is that a green test suite signals an incomplete oracle, not correct behavior, making fixture validation a necessary step before trusting any agent-generated patch.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community