Binance's $6.3B hack was not a code bug, analysts argue, pointing to signing authority
Reports from October 29–30, 2026 describe a theft of roughly $6.3–6.4 billion, which TRM Labs attributes to North Korea and which several outlets tie to an EIP-7702 update. Some of these outlets, however, suggest the update may have amplified losses rather than caused the breach, with one estimate stating most of the funds were taken without it. The author argues the relevant question is who could sign transactions, not which code primitive failed, framing the incident as a problem of authority chains in deployment systems. To illustrate, the author audited their own public repository's GitHub Actions workflow, finding overly broad write permissions inherited by all jobs and floating tag references. After reducing permissions and splitting the workflow into separate build and deploy jobs, the findings dropped from eight to three.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in