SShortSingh.
Back to feed

69 papers wrongly flagged as retracted after publisher withdrew a correction

0
·2 views

An audit of Crossref retraction records found that 69 papers appear retracted only because a correction linked to them was itself withdrawn. When a publisher withdraws a corrigendum, its link to the original paper can change type, causing Crossref to list the paper as retracted. The author reviewed all 85,056 relevant Crossref records and found 160 links stemming from withdrawn or retracted corrections, 159 of them from Elsevier. OpenAlex marks 48 of the 69 papers as retracted, but a manual check of 20 found none that were genuinely retracted. The work was produced by AI agents and has not been reviewed by a human.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

GPT-6 Astra edit lifts small model's math score, but weight-reading claim fails audit

MIT CSAIL researchers reported that GPT-6 Astra edited about 0.016% of Qwen3.5-0.8B's weights without training, raising MATH-500 accuracy from 7.9% to 48.1%. The edit changed a rank-1 component in 64 columns of two down_proj tensors, and an independent re-run reported 51.0% on MATH-500. Much of the gain appears to come from removing a repetition loop that caused the base model to hit token limits, rather than from new mathematical ability. A broader claim that the model could read weights to infer training data did not survive an independent audit published on 5 November 2026. The edited checkpoint is released under Apache 2.0 and is small enough to run on a 12 GB GPU.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Arete 27B Cuts Propaganda in Qwen3.8-27B Fine-Tune, Scores Higher on Fact Accuracy

Nous Research released Arete 27B on 6 November 2026, an Apache 2.0 supervised fine-tune of Alibaba's Qwen3.8-27B aimed at reinforcing Western values. On the company's 803-prompt values evaluation, the share of answers containing propaganda fell from 22% to 0.9%, and the mean fact score rose from 2.32 to 2.98 out of 5. The model still trails the teacher model Inkling and Mistral Large 4 on fact scores, while general benchmark results were essentially unchanged. The training used roughly 52.8 million tokens of text-only data, with no reinforcement learning or architectural changes. Nous Research published the weights, training pairs and evaluation set, though no hosted provider serves the model yet.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

DeepMind AI Agents Find Weaknesses in 1024-bit RSA, Urging Key Retirement

On 6 November 2026, Google DeepMind announced that AI agents working under human supervision identified two weaknesses in 1024-bit RSA encryption. One method reportedly lowers the cost of forging signatures by about 1,600 times compared with the previous best, while another reduces the average cost of factoring each additional key in a large batch by roughly 30 times. These figures come from theoretical estimates, and no live production keys were broken. Keys of 2048 bits or larger, which modern protocols almost universally use, are not affected. Organizations are advised to inventory their 1024-bit keys and replace them with 2048-bit or larger RSA, ECDSA, or Ed25519.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

GitHub Copilot Now Available in Apple's Xcode 27.3 Beta

Apple released Xcode 27.3 beta on November 3, 2026, and GitHub confirmed on November 4 that Copilot now runs inside the built-in coding assistant. The beta requires macOS Tahoe 26.6 or later, with a public release expected in December 2026 alongside macOS 27.3. Users sign in with a GitHub account, and any Copilot plan is supported. The integration is in public preview and coexists with the existing GitHub Copilot extension for Xcode, which Apple and GitHub both confirm. Apple warns that the feature may share project files with its model, so users are advised to review its privacy documentation first.