SShortSingh.
Back to feed

Your testing isn't the problem. Your hand-offs are.

0
·1 views

How to keep testers, developers and managers on the same page, from the bug someone finds to the fix that ships. Ask a team why a release slipped and you rarely hear "we didn't test." You hear something closer to "we didn't know." Nobody knew the bug had been fixed. Nobody knew which version of the spreadsheet was current. Nobody knew whether the thing the customer reported last week was the same thing a tester found yesterday. The testing happened.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

See Your LangGraph Agent Execute in Real Time

This is a submission for the Hacktoberfest Weekend Challenge: Build for a Friend NOTE ON TIMING: LangGraphics isn't a weekend project. Its first commit is from January 2026. This year's rules ask for new projects built within the challenge window, so I'm not presenting this as a prize entry. I'm sharing it because the challenge asks the question this project was built to answer: who did you build it for? I built it for a group of people building an agent system on LangGraph.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Why your webhook signature check fails (and the bugs that pass it)

In July I wrote about why I built verihook: every provider signs webhooks differently, and I was tired of maintaining five slightly different HMAC functions. Since then verihook has grown to 40+ providers, adapters for ten frameworks, testing helpers and a docs site. Supporting that many providers taught me where webhook verification actually goes wrong. It's rarely the HMAC. It's everything around it: the body, the secret, the URL, retries and tests.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Making My Platform API Reconcile Application Updates

In the previous post, I built the first real behavior for Platform Lab. A developer could create: apiVersion: platform.shubforge.dev/v1alpha1 kind: Application metadata: name: greeting-service spec: image: greeting-service:1.0.0 replicas: 1 port: containerPort: 8080 and the Platform Operator would create: Application | v Platform Operator | +------ Deployment | +------ Service That was the first point where the Application API actually resulted in real Kubernetes resources. But there was another important question. What happens when the Application changes? Creating resources once is useful, b

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

GoodFirst : I built my friend a way into open source.

This is a submission for the Hacktoberfest Weekend Challenge: Build for a Friend My friend Shivin wanted to get into open source this October. He could code. What stopped him was everything around the code. He'd open a real project, see a long README and a hundred open issues, and the questions piled up before he wrote a single line: Which of these files actually matter? So I built him GoodFirst.

Your testing isn't the problem. Your hand-offs are. · ShortSingh