Why Swapping Grantor and Grantee in Deed Data Is Worse Than Leaving It Blank
In property deed records, grantor and grantee define a directional relationship — the grantor conveys title while the grantee receives it — and county recorders maintain separate indexes based on this distinction. Swapping the two parties is more dangerous than omitting them entirely, because the resulting chain of title appears valid yet describes conveyances that never occurred. Different instrument types, such as deeds of trust, involve more than two parties, meaning a simple grantor-grantee schema can silently lose key roles like the trustee. Accurate extraction requires identifying the instrument type first, then anchoring on the granting clause — the operative verb phrase that places the conveying party before it and the receiving party after "unto." Positional cues like the first name on a document are unreliable, often returning the drafting attorney rather than any transacting party.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in