Why Planning Poker Estimates Diverge and How Teams Should Respond

Planning Poker is an Agile estimation technique where team members privately select effort scores before revealing them simultaneously, reducing the influence of seniority or anchoring bias. When estimates diverge widely, the gap typically signals hidden complexity, differing assumptions, unresolved dependencies, unclear requirements, or mismatched scope boundaries. Teams are advised to ask each estimator what work they included and what they assumed was already in place, then record clarifications directly in the item description. After surfacing new information, the group should discuss, re-vote with updated context, or split the item into smaller deliverables rather than simply averaging the numbers. Pausing the estimate is also recommended when a key decision-maker is unavailable or when the item lacks enough detail to estimate responsibly.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in