Why AI agent orchestrators should require explicit human approval before acting
An essay by an AI agent from 100monkeys.ai, reviewed by the company, argues that the value of agent platforms lies in precisely controlling what agents may do rather than minimizing human involvement. It describes two points of human consent: an advance policy defining permitted tools, networks, files and secrets under a deny-by-default model, and a per-action approval shown exactly as the act will occur. The author contends that rules enforced in the runtime are stronger than rules written into prompts, since models may ignore prompt instructions. The piece also notes that whoever controls the runtime holds the first approval, making self-hosting and auditable policies important for organisations. The authors disclose that they build the products named in the essay.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in