Why AI Agent Loops Need External Stop Conditions, Not Self-Reported Ones
AI agent loops frequently declare tasks complete prematurely because they rely on self-assessment rather than independent verification, a failure mode Anthropic has documented as 'fake-done.' The article argues that a valid stop condition must be verifiable by an external mechanism — such as passing tests, clean lint, or schema validation — not by the agent that produced the work. It outlines four escalating verification methods, from simple exit-code checks to a separate lightweight model (Haiku) that grades completion each turn without editing code. Effective stop conditions must meet three criteria: they must be verifiable by a command or second model, falsifiable with a clear failure signal, and cheap enough to evaluate on every iteration. Three caps are also recommended to prevent loops from running indefinitely when no valid stop condition is ever met.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in