What Indian Developers Actually Pay to Publish an App on Apple's App Store in 2026

·28 views

Publishing an iPhone app on Apple's App Store costs Indian developers approximately ₹9,500 per year, equivalent to the $99 USD annual Apple Developer Program membership fee. Unlike Google Play's one-time $25 lifetime fee, Apple's annual charge must be renewed continuously or existing apps get delisted and updates are blocked. Developers enrolling as an organization face additional requirements, including obtaining a D-U-N-S number, a verified legal entity, a company domain email, and a working website, all of which can add days to the process. Apple reviews 90% of app submissions within 24 hours, but over 40% of unresolved rejections stem from basic completeness issues such as crashes, placeholder content, or incomplete features. Solo developers and small Indian studios are advised to treat the annual ₹9,500 fee as a recurring operational cost rather than a one-time launch expense.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Tinfoil, a YC P25 startup, seeks an applied AI security engineer in San Francisco

Tinfoil, a startup from Y Combinator's P25 batch, has posted a job opening for an applied AI security engineer based in San Francisco. The listing was shared on Hacker News, where it has so far received no points or comments. The source material provides no details about the role's responsibilities, requirements, or compensation. It also offers no further information about the company's products or hiring plans.

0 comments Read more at Hacker News

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

osFoundry adds a prompt library with versioning and reusable skills for agents

osFoundry, a desktop app combining chat, agents, files and tools, now includes a Prompt Library that gathers prompts in one searchable place with favorites and usage counts. Users can save edits either by overwriting a prompt or as a new version, keeping earlier wording available for reuse. Prompts can contain placeholders such as {{product}} that the app fills in through a simple form before inserting the text into the chat. Proven prompts can also be converted into skills in Studio, which agents use automatically when a task matches their trigger and assigned tools.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Testing a pump underload detector before it controls a motor

A running pump may draw less current when it loses load, but a low current reading alone cannot confirm a dry pump, so the detector should report suspected underload with supporting context. Measurements should begin only after the motor is confirmed running and the startup window has passed, and mismatches between run commands and contactor feedback should be logged. Missing, stale, or invalid current data should be treated as a sensor fault rather than as zero current. The alert should use its own persistence timer and reset when readings return to normal, while latched alarms, motor-stop logic, and protection hardware remain independent of the telemetry. Validation should involve replaying simulated traces, comparing results against normal operation at several operating points, and logging timestamps, RMS current, motor state, thresholds, and fault reasons.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Solana token rules can be verified with a single RPC call, no SDK needed

A developer published a method for reading a Solana token's rules using one standard RPC request, requiring no SDK, wallet, or keys. The approach decodes the token's mint account to reveal its owner program, mint and freeze authorities, and Token-2022 extensions such as transfer fees, transfer hooks, and permanent delegates. The author applies the check weekly to one token and says it recently corrected earlier documentation that had misstated the token's technical setup. Using the method on the WEN mint, the author found it runs on the original SPL Token program with authorities revoked and no extensions. The post argues that repeatable, rerunnable checks provide stronger evidence than one-time snapshots.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community