Vulnerability management for MSPs: cadence, reporting and quarterly reviews
Managed service providers find it easier to sell vulnerability management as an ongoing outcome than as a one-off scan, since clients struggle to grasp what a single scan delivers. A typical service combines scheduled internal and external scanning, a monthly or quarterly report, remediation of in-scope items, and a client review, with monthly cadence serving as the usual baseline for small and mid-sized clients. The monthly report should lead with what is new, what was fixed, and what remains open or overdue, with known exploited vulnerabilities placed first and technical detail moved to an appendix. Remediation works best when each action is tracked as a ticket in the MSP's PSA system rather than left in a PDF. Quarterly reviews should emphasise trends and overdue items instead of raw finding totals, and the article notes that turning scanner exports into client-readable reports is the step that is hardest to scale.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in