Using VPC Endpoints Instead of NAT Gateways to Cut AWS Traffic Costs
Workloads in private subnets often send traffic to services like S3, ECR, and CloudWatch through a NAT Gateway, which can incur unexpected charges. NAT Gateways bill both an hourly rate and a per-GB data processing fee, and these costs grow when traffic is destined for AWS services. VPC endpoints let resources reach supported services without passing through the NAT Gateway. Gateway endpoints for S3 and DynamoDB carry no additional hourly or data charges, while interface endpoints for services such as ECR and CloudWatch do incur hourly and data fees, so their cost should be compared first. A NAT Gateway may still be needed for other outbound traffic, so the aim is to identify suitable traffic and weigh costs before changing the design.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in