SShortSingh.
Back to feed

Two AI reviewers, one Fastify PR, and a 404 that quietly became a 414

0
·3 views

I ran two AI code reviewers from different vendors over the same merged pull request. One of them found nothing. The other found a behavior change that is still in Fastify today, and it was wrong about one important detail. This is what happened, how I checked it, and what I changed in my own tool because of it. fastify#6716, "feat: add support of onMaxParamLength", merged in May and first released in v5.9.0.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

I'm not a programmer. I ran cafes. Then I built an AI coworker that uses my PC without stealing my screen.

A year ago I was running small shops in Seoul - a cafe, a convenience store, food. I can't really code. But I kept watching AI "computer use" demos and thinking: this is amazing, and also I would never use it every day. The loop is always the same: take a screenshot, think, click, take another screenshot. Each step takes seconds.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

What breaks when you ship to ten locales at once

I localized a mobile app into ten languages. Most of what I'd read beforehand was about how to These are the mistakes I actually made. This is the one I'd undo first. The quiz content — the part users came for — got translated properly. The surrounding interface did The result is worse than an English-only app, because it sets an expectation and then breaks it.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Designing for people reading in their second language

Most people using the products I work on are preparing for a US licensing exam in a language that isn't The thing I keep relearning: they are not bad at the test. The test is being delivered through a Every bit of that layer you remove goes straight into their score. Here is what I've learned about removing it. "Which of the following is not required when…" A fluent reader handles this without noticing. A second-language reader has to hold the entire option Official exam material is full of negation and you often can't change that — but everything around it Double negation — "which is not perm