Treat LLM Tools Like Public Endpoints: Eight Review Questions for .NET 10 AIFunctions
A developer argues that LLM tools built with AIFunctionFactory in .NET 10 deserve the same scrutiny as public HTTP endpoints, since the model caller writes its own arguments. Tool names created from lambdas or method names are unreliable, so the article recommends explicit, stable names defined in attributes. It also warns that DataAnnotations constraints shape the schema but are not enforced at invocation, so a request with out-of-range values can still execute. The author's remedy is a wrapper that validates arguments against the same schema shown to the model before the tool runs. The piece presents this as the first of eight review questions for each tool.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in