SShortSingh.
TopTechnologyAI & MLStartupsProgrammingScienceBusinessFinanceCrypto & Web3World
Back to feed
Programming

Tool Converts OpenAPI Definitions Into Full Frontend Apps Using Formly

0
·25 views

A new developer tool built on top of Formly aims to eliminate repetitive frontend work by automatically generating functional applications from OpenAPI definitions. Instead of manually coding forms, tables, validation, and API connections for each project, developers simply provide an OpenAPI spec and the tool builds the interface. The generated frontend can be further customized through the Formly Designer, allowing developers to refine labels, add descriptions, and swap in custom components. The tool is currently available to try via a hosted demo at grumptech.github.io, requiring only a temporary CORS configuration change on the backend. The developer behind the project is seeking community feedback on features, use cases, and potential improvements.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingHacker News ·

Why DDR3 and newer DRAM interfaces need tuning at boot: a look at the PHY

A documentation page from the LiteDRAM project on GitHub explains the DRAM interface and the physical layer (PHY) used to connect memory to a controller. It focuses on why DDR3 and later memory standards must be calibrated during system startup. The material is part of the project's manual and is hosted in its documentation directory. The article text provided is only a link and metadata, so the specific technical details are not included in this summary. The post drew a modest response on Hacker News, with 4 points and no comments at the time it was captured.

0 comments Read more at Hacker News
0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Why Multi-Agent Coding Systems Fail in Production and a Proposed Isolation Fix

A technical report argues that many enterprise multi-agent coding projects stall because the same model both writes and judges its own code, letting blind spots compound. The author describes a containment design that partitions state by role, so an orchestrator, a contracts owner, and separate backend and frontend workers each control only their own files. Each phase must pass two independent checks: a clean-room tester that runs real builds and audits, and a read-only auditor that cannot edit what it reviews. After three failed reviews, automated retries stop and the issue is escalated with evidence. The report frames reliability as a state-isolation and control problem rather than a prompting one.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community
0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Keep Unowned Stale Vendor TXT Records Until Dependencies Are Confirmed During Mail Cutovers

The piece argues that during an edtech company's mail provider change, unknown vendor TXT verification records should be kept rather than deleted. Its reasoning is that an unowned record may still support a third-party verification dependency, and deleting it is the main risk even though retained records mostly add clutter. It recommends recording ownership when records are created, reviewing the zone periodically, and using stable record names so verifications do not accumulate. The author proposes a review process that keeps approved mail intent separate from the observed DNS state and labels unresolved tokens as needing ownership review. The hypothetical example is framed as illustrative planning rather than measured data.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community
0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Seven Java library changes that compile and pass tests but break existing users

A DEV Community article lists seven library changes in Java that compile and pass the library's own tests yet still break its users. The author distinguishes source compatibility, whether callers' code still compiles, from binary compatibility, whether previously compiled code still runs against the new jar. Because applications often update a library without recompiling its dependents, binary compatibility is especially important. Each example is checked on Java 25 and shows the real error messages that result. The article suggests safer alternatives, such as adding overloads, keeping return types, or giving new interface methods default implementations.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community