Texttile: Open-Source Multiplayer Blog Engine Built for Co-Authors

·3 views

A developer has released Texttile, an open-source blog engine designed for people who write together, inspired by ten years of collaborative travel blogging with his wife. The tool allows multiple users to share the same entry simultaneously, with real-time text handoff and a shared photo-and-video gallery. Unlike mainstream platforms, Texttile runs entirely on a self-hosted Docker image combining Phoenix, LiveView, ffmpeg, and SQLite, with no external CDNs, trackers, or third-party embeds. Videos are hosted on the user's own server and automatically converted with thumbnails by the app. The project is intentionally simple, with no roles or permission tiers — every account holder is an admin, reflecting its design for small, trusted groups.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Terminal Markdown Tool readm3 Gains Editing Mode and Multi-Flavor Parsing Support

readm3, a terminal-based markdown reader, has been updated with a built-in editing mode that allows users to write, preview, and save markdown files without leaving the app. The tool's original hand-rolled regex parser has been replaced with the 'marked' library, chosen for its zero external dependencies, which fixes issues with reference links, nested lists, and bare URL autolinks. A new --flavor switch lets users choose between CommonMark, GitHub, Reddit, and a combined mode, since each standard handles elements like spoiler tags and emoji shortcodes differently. Reddit-specific syntax such as superscript and spoiler tags required custom handling, as they conflict with standard markdown parsing rules. The updated version is tested across Node 22, Node 24, and Bun on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and is available via npm or Bun as @profullstack/readm3.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

84% of Developers Use AI Coding Tools, but Human Review Remains Critical

As AI coding assistants like Copilot, Claude, and Cursor become mainstream, a Stack Overflow 2025 survey found that 84% of developers use or plan to use such tools, yet trust in AI-generated output remains limited. Developers report a recurring frustration with code that is "almost right" but not fully correct, secure, or maintainable. Experts argue that the developer's core role is shifting from writing code to critically reviewing AI output — checking whether the right problem is being solved, not just whether the code compiles. Key review areas include architectural fit, edge-case handling, and whether AI-generated tests actually reflect real requirements or merely mirror the model's own misunderstandings. The consensus is that AI can generate features quickly, but human judgment is still essential before any AI-written code is considered production-ready.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How to Enforce User-Level RBAC on Laravel AI Agents to Prevent Data Leaks

AI agents integrated into Laravel applications operate outside the standard HTTP middleware stack, executing logic through API calls, background queues, or CLI commands without session cookies or user context. This stateless execution means a poorly configured tool can inadvertently expose unrestricted database access, effectively granting the agent god-mode privileges over sensitive data. The recommended fix is to treat the LLM as a proxy for the human user, explicitly passing the invoking user's identity into the agent's execution context via Laravel auth guards or custom context data transfer objects. Permission enforcement must happen at the database query level using Eloquent scopes and authorization gates, rather than relying on system prompts to filter results. For complex scenarios involving multi-tenancy or attribute-based access control, dedicated packages and thorough per-tool audit logging tied to the acting user's ID are advised.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Why a Successful snmpwalk Does Not Mean Your Monitoring Is Complete

Network engineer Goda, writing for DEV Community, explains that a successful snmpwalk command only confirms basic SNMP connectivity — not that all required monitoring metrics are actually retrievable. The distinction became clear when a reviewer asked which specific OIDs would be used to monitor CPU and memory during a device test. Goda notes that values like hrProcessorLoad and hrStorageUsed require additional context, such as averaging periods and unit conversions, to be meaningful. A single snmpwalk result leaves critical questions unanswered, including whether the monitoring server can collect the data and whether alert traps are correctly configured. The article recommends separating SNMP testing into distinct checks covering connectivity, metric availability, server collection, and trap behavior.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community