SShortSingh.
Back to feed

Suvendu Adhikari says he kept Bhabanipur seat to stop Mamata Banerjee from contesting again

0
·4 views

BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari has said he chose to retain the Bhabanipur seat because he did not want Mamata Banerjee to contest another election from it. He framed the decision as a deliberate political move rather than a routine one. The remarks were made in the context of his explanation for why he held on to the constituency. No further details about the timing or setting of the remarks were available in the source text provided.

Read the full story at Times of India

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
IndiaTimes of India ·

15-Year-Old Bailey Quinn Frank Wins $25,000 National Science Prize for Air Sampler

Bailey Quinn Frank, a 15-year-old from Fort Lauderdale, has received a $25,000 national science award. She built an inexpensive device that captures bacterial DNA floating in the air, aiming to support environmental health monitoring. Her project found that bacterial communities differ between indoor and outdoor air samples. The competition tested participants on scientific problem-solving and teamwork. Frank's win points to how affordable scientific methods can help tackle real-world issues.

0
IndiaTimes of India ·

1969 Vietnam soldier's 43-minute audio letter to his mother preserved by Smithsonian

In March 1969, Frank A. Kowalczyk recorded a 43-minute audio message from Vietnam for his mother. The personal recording included updates about family and reflections on his military service. It also captured the contrast between the sounds of helicopters in Vietnam and the everyday life of his family back home. The tape is now preserved by the Smithsonian.

0
IndiaNDTV ·

Supreme Court Says Election Commission Cannot Modify Forms 6, 7 and 8 in Delhi SIR Hearing

The Supreme Court made observations on the Election Commission's handling of Forms 6, 7 and 8 during a hearing related to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Delhi. The bench questioned why people already on the electoral rolls are being required to fill out Form 6 to get their names re-enrolled. The court's remarks suggest it views the Commission as lacking authority to alter these forms. The article text available is brief, so further details on the court's final decision or directions are not reported here.