Study finds volatility model choice shifts gamma-exposure flip estimates by up to 13%
Researchers tested how swapping the volatility model in a gamma-exposure (GEX) terminal affects its outputs, running identical production machinery across 14 trading sessions with only the vol input changed. Black-Scholes, SVI smile-fitting, and a Gram-Charlier expansion were compared, with results showing the zero-gamma flip point shifted by 2.5–8.3 points and net gamma at spot changed by 4–13% depending on the model used. Notably, the SVI upgrade worsened flip stability in 10 of 14 sessions, and Gram-Charlier corrections were smallest near expiry — precisely where theory predicts Black-Scholes is most inaccurate. The study concluded that no single model can be declared correct since there is no minute-level exchange ground truth for gamma. Rather than switching models, the team fixed a discontinuous root selector in the terminal, cutting frame-to-frame flip jumps from a 95th-percentile of 17.6 to 4.5 points, and added a crossing standard error band to the display.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in