ServiceNow CIS-RC Exam 2026: Format, Domains and Preparation Guide

·2 views

The ServiceNow Certified Implementation Specialist – Risk and Compliance (CIS-RC) exam tests the ability to configure, implement and maintain the Risk, Policy and Compliance, and Audit Management applications. It runs for 90 minutes, is booked through ServiceNow University at a cost of 450 learning credits, and can be taken at a Pearson VUE test centre or online with a webcam proctor. No prerequisite certification is required, though ServiceNow recommends about six months of field experience and several foundational courses. Policy and Compliance, Risk and Advanced Risk, and Entity Framework together account for 70% of the exam weighting. Certified candidates must also pass annual maintenance exams and pay a yearly fee to keep the credential.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Managed database backups versus object storage for SaaS data recovery

An edtech SaaS storing lessons, grading exports, and archives can split backups between a managed database service and private object storage. Managed Postgres or MySQL backups suit point-in-time rollback, while dump files in object storage suit cheap long-term retention and inspectable restores. Object storage holds most of the bytes in large media packages, while the database dump identifies which tenant, course, and artifact belong together. Object-based restores require more manual steps such as locating prefixes, verifying checksums, and reconnecting references, which adds operational cost. The article recommends choosing the recovery primitive first, based on whether the requirement is point-in-time restoration or retrieving an archived training package.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Firefox Extensions Aim to Cut Browser Distraction and Support Digital Wellbeing

A DEV Community post argues that browsers are a major source of digital distraction, since news feeds, social media, and infinite scroll are built to hold attention rather than support productive work. It proposes Firefox extensions for a more intentional setup, such as a news widget that shows only user-chosen RSS feeds and a daily planner that replaces the default new tab. Other tools described include a habit tracker for monthly goals, NightOwl for automatic dark mode at sunset to ease evening screen exposure, and a Tab Manager that saves and closes tabs to reduce clutter. The author also suggests Voice Notes as a way to capture ideas on the computer instead of reaching for a phone.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Django 6.1's FETCH_PEERS recovers most lost queries but not all hand-tuned ones

A developer tested Django 6.1's FETCH_PEERS fetch mode on their football quiz site, ExtraTime, across 467 routes and 3,963 requests. Removing all select_related calls raised total queries from 59,198 to 76,144, and enabling FETCH_PEERS recovered about 69% of that increase. The mode helped most on endpoints loading many objects that share the same relations, such as one that gained a large speedup, yet it did nothing on 115 routes that handle single objects or use iterators. The admin's group page also showed no improvement, because form choice fields call iterator(), which turns the mode off in practice. The author concluded that FETCH_PEERS is useful but cannot fully replace explicit select_related and prefetch_related tuning.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Warning Signs That a Fintech Build Would Struggle Under an FCA Review

Fintech teams often discover too late that their software cannot answer a regulator's questions, with the warning signs appearing in early design choices that were never treated as compliance matters. Balances overwritten in place leave no way to trace how a figure was reached, and audit logging added near launch leaves months unrecorded. Business rules without versioning, and permissions enforced only through feature flags, make it hard to show past decisions or who authorised them. Scope set by customer requests rather than by what a review would need to verify tends to leave gaps that surface when little time remains. The article recommends settling authorisation and evidence requirements with a regulatory specialist before building begins.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community