Reviewer flags two AI conference papers for fake authors, both still accepted

A researcher serving as a peer reviewer flagged two submitted papers for listing fabricated or fake authors, raising serious concerns about academic integrity. Despite the explicit flags, both papers were accepted as oral presentations at the conference. The incident highlights growing vulnerabilities in the peer review process, particularly as AI-generated content becomes more prevalent in academic submissions. The reviewer shared their experience publicly, sparking discussion about how conferences verify author identities and handle integrity complaints. The case adds to broader concerns about the reliability of academic vetting systems in the age of generative AI.