Plan Stamping for Software: Why Human Approval of AI-Written Code Needs a Definition
A developer had a coding agent build a password reset feature that appeared to work and was approved, yet the reset link could be reused, exposing a flaw in an unstated invariant. The author argues that human approval of code they did not directly produce establishes little on its own. Drawing on engineering and architecture, where a professional seal certifies a defined relationship to the work and can be sanctioned if misused, the piece suggests software needs a shared meaning for what a reviewer's sign-off actually certifies. The concern grows as teams use agents to generate many changes that a single reviewer may not have time to scrutinize. The discussion grew out of a conversation about junior developers, credentialing, and whether portfolios still show competence.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.


Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in