SShortSingh.
Back to feed

Muon Optimizer Treats Neural Network Weights as Matrices, Outpaces AdamW

0
·12 views

Muon is a neural network optimizer that differs from the widely used AdamW by treating weight matrices as linear transformations rather than collections of independent scalar values. While AdamW applies element-wise gradient statistics, Muon uses singular value decomposition to preserve gradient directions while equalizing their magnitudes — a process called update orthogonalization. The optimizer emerged in October 2024 from the NanoGPT speedrunning competition, where a Muon-based run improved training speed by roughly 35% over the previous record. It was developed collaboratively by Keller Jordan and contributors including Jeremy Bernstein, Yuchen Jin, and Vlado Boza, each refining different aspects of the method. Muon has since scaled to multi-billion-parameter language models and been integrated into the mainstream PyTorch optimization stack.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

AI Can Generate Code, but Engineers Are Still Needed to Make Software Work

Tech leaders Marc Benioff of Salesforce and Mark Zuckerberg of Meta have predicted that AI will transform software engineering, with Benioff citing productivity gains for possibly limiting 2025 hiring. The article argues that generating code is only one part of building dependable software, since engineers must grasp user needs, integrate changes into complex systems, and verify outcomes. A 2025 METR study of 16 experienced developers found they took about 19% longer on tasks with AI tools, even though they believed the tools had sped them up. Google's 2024 DORA research linked higher AI adoption to lower delivery stability across the organizations it studied, though it did not establish causation. The piece concludes that AI will reshape engineering work but will not remove the need for human judgment, review, and responsibility.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Why a clean static analysis scan can still miss real vulnerabilities

A security series author ran a free static analyzer on their own service's code and got zero findings with its default rule set. A second run using a JavaScript-specific rule set flagged the post-login redirect logic, and the underlying flaw went unnoticed by every Semgrep rule set they tried. An AI code reviewer caught the issue when the fix was tested, and it has since been patched. The author's takeaway is that zero findings does not guarantee safety, so developers should layer different checking methods, verify every hit, and rerun scans regularly. The piece also notes that static analysis can reveal secrets such as API keys left in git history, including a deactivated AWS key found with Gitleaks.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How Remote Teams Can Choose the Right Online Whiteboard Tool

Online whiteboards have replaced physical walls for remote and hybrid teams, supporting brainstorming, retrospectives, diagrams and design work. The article argues that tools look alike in demos, so differences only emerge after weeks of real use with large boards and many participants. It recommends first listing the main situations where a team will use a whiteboard, then ranking them to decide which trade-offs are acceptable. Teams should test the canvas with realistic content, including performance on large boards, text handling, connectors, frames and recovery options. Collaboration features such as cursors, facilitation tools, guest access and asynchronous commenting also deserve trial sessions before a decision is made.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Researcher Claims Flaw in Vaani Voice AI Let Him Hijack Agents Across Tenants

A security researcher describes finding a flaw in Vaani, a voice AI agent platform that won Product Hunt's top daily spot, at a company hackathon. He says a single HTTP request from a free account could take over AI agents belonging to other customers, redirecting their outbound calls to read attacker-supplied prompts. The issue reportedly stemmed from predictable agent identifiers that were not properly protected by access controls. The researcher says he demonstrated the hijack without accessing private data and that the vendor has since patched the problem. The account highlights risks in multi-tenant voice AI systems that place outbound phone lines under automated agent control.