Meta Goes to Trial Over Claims Facebook and Instagram Harm Young Users

·1 views

Meta is facing a landmark trial over allegations that its platforms, Facebook and Instagram, are harmful to young users. A coalition of states has brought the case against the tech giant, seeking a court order to restrict minors' access to its platforms. The states also want Meta to remove features they claim are deliberately addictive, such as infinite scroll and algorithmic content recommendation systems. The lawsuit reflects growing regulatory pressure on social media companies over their impact on youth mental health and well-being.

Read the full story at NDTV

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

‘Show of strength’ that wasn’t: BJP protest against Omar government marred by low turnout

0 comments Read more at Indian Express

IndiaTimes of India ·

NYC's Iconic Flatiron Building Converts to Luxury Residences, Units Selling Fast

New York City's historic Flatiron Building is being transformed from an office building into upscale residential apartments. The landmark conversion project is nearing completion, with move-ins expected this autumn. Buyer demand has been strong, with most units already under contract. A single apartment recently sold for $24 million, underscoring the high-end appeal of the development. Future residents will have access to modern amenities within the century-old architectural icon.

0 comments Read more at Times of India

IndiaTimes of India ·

PM CARES Fund data made public; balance rises to Rs 8,452 crore

0 comments Read more at Times of India

IndiaNDTV ·

Mumbai's New Marathi Language Rule for Cab Drivers Sparks Debate

Mumbai authorities have introduced a new rule requiring cab drivers to know Marathi, the regional language of Maharashtra. The mandate has drawn criticism from observers who question what practical problem the policy is intended to solve. Critics argue that the city's taxi and cab sector has functioned effectively for years without such a language requirement. The rule raises broader concerns about whether it addresses a genuine public need or serves a different political purpose.

0 comments Read more at NDTV