Manual vs Generated OAuth Scopes: Key Lessons from Building an Identity Platform

·2 views

A developer building a custom identity platform explored two contrasting approaches to managing OAuth scopes: manual creation and model-generated automation. Manual scope management is simple and familiar, working well for small systems, but tends to become disorganized as applications scale — leading to orphaned, duplicate, or undocumented scopes. The generated approach derives scopes automatically from a defined authorization model, ensuring consistency, a single source of truth, and easier auditing. However, generated scopes introduce added complexity, as the authorization model itself must be carefully structured and maintained. The experiment highlights that while manual management suits smaller projects, generated scopes offer significant long-term advantages for enterprise-scale identity systems.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Bottleneck Scoring Model Flags Fatal AI Readiness Gaps Weighted Averages Miss

A software developer has published a write-up detailing a flaw in standard weighted-average readiness assessments, where a team's critical weakness can be masked by strong scores in other areas. To address this, the author designed a bottleneck scoring model that caps the total score whenever a fatal precondition — such as lacking version control or human review — is absent. The mechanism reduces mathematically to Math.min(baseScore, cap), meaning the lowest applicable cap always determines the ceiling. The model is implemented in a fully client-side, open-source AI readiness assessment tool built with TypeScript, React 19, and Vite, with all user data stored locally and never transmitted externally. The article argues that AI-assisted development amplifies the consequences of missing safety practices, making bottleneck-aware scoring more appropriate than simple additive models.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Solo Dev Skipped App Analytics for Privacy, Lost Two Months of Useful Data

A solo developer launched a niche resale app with no analytics, believing it aligned with their privacy principles, but soon found themselves unable to answer basic questions about user engagement or retention. Apple's built-in App Store analytics only capture users who opt into data sharing, making the sample size too small to be meaningful for low-volume apps. After two months of guessing, the developer added just two tracked events — when a user adds an item and when they mark it sold — providing a clear picture of real usage. Within two weeks, they identified around 140 active users, a 40% next-day return rate, and roughly one-third completing the full add-to-sell cycle. The developer concluded that minimal, privacy-respecting analytics and user privacy are not mutually exclusive, and urged other indie developers to instrument key moments before launch rather than after.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Digital Minimalism: Practical Steps to Reclaim Focus in a Distracted World

Digital minimalism is a philosophy of intentional technology use, focused on reducing digital clutter rather than abandoning devices altogether. Constant connectivity fragments attention through a state called Continuous Partial Attention, which diminishes the brain's capacity for deep, focused work. Practical strategies include auditing and deleting unused apps, disabling non-essential notifications, adding friction to mindless social media use, and establishing tech-free zones at home. Reducing screen time is said to free up hours that can be redirected toward analog activities, creative pursuits, and meaningful conversations. The approach is framed as an ongoing practice centered on awareness rather than perfection.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Two-table LLM caching pattern cuts 20M-row storage to a few MB in AI pipelines

Engineering teams running agentic AI pipelines on large, periodically-refreshed datasets face a dilemma: wiping old data risks destroying costly LLM-generated cache results stored in the same table. A proposed solution separates the cache into a small, standalone lookup table keyed on a stable input identifier, keeping it intact when the main data table is wiped and reloaded. This works because a 20-million-row working table may contain only around 60,000 distinct LLM inputs, meaning enrichment results can be stored once and referenced by all duplicate rows. During each new data load cycle, a SQL join propagates cached results to matching rows, and the LLM is called only for genuinely new inputs. The approach avoids large in-place UPDATE penalties in PostgreSQL by eventually using a Create Table As Select and swap pattern to prevent table bloat.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community