SShortSingh.
Back to feed

Mamata Defends Abhishek Amid TMC Rebellion, Accuses Rebels of BJP Ties

0
·2 views

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has publicly backed her nephew Abhishek Banerjee, asserting he has done nothing wrong amid growing dissent within the Trinamool Congress. She accused rebel leaders of unfairly targeting Abhishek and his family. Mamata suggested that Madan Mitra's departure from the party was linked to ED summons and alleged a possible understanding with the BJP. She downplayed the rebellion, maintaining that a handful of defections would not weaken the TMC. The party chief pledged to strengthen the organisation and press ahead with its political agenda.

Read the full story at Times of India

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
IndiaTimes of India ·

NPCIL: Kudankulam Data Leak Affects Only Non-Nuclear Systems, No Security Risk

India's Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) has clarified that a reported data breach at the Kudankulam nuclear plant does not involve any nuclear safety or reactor core systems. The leaked files are said to pertain exclusively to conventional, non-nuclear infrastructure within the facility. The compromised documents were originally prepared by Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. in connection with common plant services. The affected data relates to units that are currently still under construction at the site. NPCIL emphasized that nuclear security remains fully intact and has not been compromised by the breach.

0
IndiaNDTV ·

Allahabad HC: Mother Cannot Seek Maintenance From Stepson After Real Son Pays

The Allahabad High Court ruled on Tuesday that a mother cannot claim maintenance from her stepson if she is already receiving it from her biological son. Justice Laxmi Kant Shukla delivered the judgement, stating that financial support from a real son removes the condition of inability to self-maintain. The court held that once a mother is no longer incapable of supporting herself, she loses legal grounds for a subsequent maintenance order. The ruling effectively bars double maintenance claims across biological and step-relations under these circumstances.