Karate DSL Automates API Testing in Quarkus-Redis Microservice Architectures

·1 views

A developer has demonstrated how Karate DSL can replace manual API testing tools like Postman or curl in modern microservice environments. The implementation was built around a Quarkus and Redis-based service that manages persistent counters, using Karate's Gherkin-style BDD syntax to define readable integration test scenarios. Karate allows HTTP requests to be executed directly from .feature files, removing the need for Java boilerplate code and turning tests into living documentation. The test suite integrates natively with Gradle's build lifecycle, ensuring automated validation on every code change. The full source code for this Quarkus-Redis-Karate setup has been made publicly available on GitHub.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Laid-Off Developer Builds AI Tools to Automate Resume Scoring and Job Filtering

A developer laid off several months ago created two reusable Claude Code skills to streamline their job search after repeatedly spending too much time evaluating listings and keeping resumes updated. The first tool, /score-job, reads a job description alongside multiple personal resume files and produces a structured scorecard covering fit, gaps, strengths, and tailored resume bullets. The second tool, /resume-sharpener, is designed to mine patterns across scored listings to surface recurring gaps and improve resume content over time. Both tools are built as markdown-based skill files that Claude Code can invoke via slash commands, re-reading source documents fresh on every run to reflect updates. The developer also built in a dual-scoring mode for roles involving a career pivot, showing honest fit against both their current track record and their intended new direction.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Software Marketplaces Fail Developers by Hiding Critical Technical Details

A analysis published on DEV Community argues that most software marketplace listings are inadequate for developers evaluating source-code purchases, as they prioritize marketing visuals over technical substance. Two listings can appear nearly identical in features and screenshots yet differ vastly in code quality, with one running a modern, well-maintained stack and another built on abandoned dependencies and outdated runtimes. The author highlights that key details like framework versions, PHP or Node.js versions, and dependency trees are rarely disclosed, forcing buyers into costly technical debt from the start. A generic 'last updated' timestamp is also criticized as misleading, since it reveals nothing about whether the change was a security fix, a framework upgrade, or merely a description edit. The piece calls for standardized, developer-focused listing information including dependency files, version histories, and structured changelogs to help buyers make informed decisions.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

7 Security Checks Developers Must Run Before Shipping AI-Generated Next.js Apps

AI coding assistants can rapidly generate functional Next.js and Supabase applications, but the generated code often carries hidden security risks around credentials, authorization, and data access. Developers are advised to audit repositories and client bundles for exposed secrets, including service-role keys that should never appear in frontend code or Git history. Every API route and server action must verify user identity server-side, as hiding UI elements does not substitute for proper authorization. Supabase Row Level Security policies should be tested thoroughly to confirm that one user cannot read or modify another user's data. Additional checks include validating all external inputs with schema validators, enforcing rate limits on sensitive operations, and configuring CORS policies deliberately to avoid unintended credential exposure.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Why 7:45 Is Not 7.45 Hours: The Math Behind Timesheet Decimal Conversion

Converting time from hours-and-minutes format to decimal hours is a common requirement in payroll, billing, and project management systems. The correct formula divides minutes by 60 and seconds by 3600, then adds the result to the whole hours — so 7 hours 45 minutes equals 7.75, not 7.45. A frequent error occurs when people treat the minutes portion as a decimal directly, which leads to miscalculations in cost and billing reports. The reverse conversion is equally straightforward: multiply the decimal portion by 60 to recover the minutes. For teams handling large datasets, using a dedicated calculator or spreadsheet formula reduces manual errors and speeds up timesheet processing.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community