InsForge MCP Outperforms Supabase MCP on Claude Sonnet 4.6 in Updated Benchmark
InsForge has published updated MCPMark v2 benchmark results comparing its MCP tool against Supabase MCP, this time using Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.6 model across the same 21 real-world Postgres database tasks. InsForge achieved 42.86% strict Pass⁴ accuracy versus Supabase MCP's 33.33%, while consuming 2.4 times fewer tokens per run — a efficiency gap that has widened significantly since the Sonnet 4.5 benchmarks. Supabase MCP's token usage actually increased from 11.6 million to 17.9 million tokens per run with the newer model, while InsForge's usage slightly decreased from 8.2 million to 7.3 million. InsForge attributes its advantage to surfacing structured backend context — such as record counts, RLS policies, and foreign keys — before the agent acts, reducing the need for costly discovery queries. The findings suggest that as AI models grow more capable, the performance penalty for lacking structured backend context increases rather than diminishes.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in