SShortSingh.
Back to feed

Infrastructure Scanners Can Silently Misreport S3 Security Due to Failed API Calls

0
·1 views

A software engineer discovered a critical data-integrity flaw in infrastructure scanning tools, including their own platform Infrawise, where failed AWS API calls were being recorded as false security findings rather than as errors. When a scanner lacks permission to read S3 bucket configurations, AccessDenied responses were defaulting to values like encrypted: false, making unread buckets appear insecure. This meant audit reports could flag buckets for missing encryption or versioning even when those properties were never actually checked. The fix involves introducing a third null state to distinguish a confirmed observation from an unread result, preventing false findings from being generated on incomplete data. However, the engineer also noted that some AWS APIs signal real absences through specific error codes, requiring those exceptions to be handled individually rather than collapsed into a generic null fallback.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How to Set Up Ubuntu Server on Apple Silicon Mac Using UTM and What Errors Mean

A senior software engineer documented setting up an Ubuntu Server 24.04 LTS virtual machine on an Apple Silicon Mac using the free virtualization app UTM, as a first step toward learning platform and cloud engineering. The guide highlights a critical setup detail: Apple Silicon Macs require the ARM64 build of Ubuntu, not the x86 version, to avoid failed or extremely slow performance. After installation, users encounter a prompt to remove the installation medium, which simply requires clearing the ISO from the VM's virtual CD/DVD drive in UTM settings before rebooting. Another common moment of confusion occurs at the login screen, where Linux intentionally shows no characters while typing a password — a deliberate security measure rather than a system freeze. The author used a VM specifically to allow safe experimentation, since any mistakes in the guest system leave the host Mac completely unaffected.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How to Decide What Documentation Should Be Public or Internal

A technical writing guide outlines a framework for distinguishing between internal and external documentation based on the intended reader and their task. Internal documentation covers architecture decisions, private system details, credentials, and candid incident analysis meant only for employees and operators. External documentation addresses supported behaviors, integration guides, prerequisites, and recovery steps aimed at customers, partners, and public developers. When a topic serves both audiences, it should be split into separate documents with distinct access controls rather than combined into one page. The guide recommends asking four key questions about audience need, sensitivity, operator context, and ownership to determine where any given piece of documentation belongs.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How Agent-to-Agent Protocols Are Replacing Prompt Chains in Production AI Systems

As AI deployments scale beyond simple chatbots, engineers are moving away from prompt chaining toward treating agents as structured infrastructure with explicit contracts and standardized communication. Prompt-based systems struggle with three core problems at scale: non-deterministic control flow, lack of isolation boundaries, and opaque debugging. Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocols address this by letting agents communicate through typed, versioned, machine-readable capability contracts rather than hardcoded API calls. Each A2A message carries lifecycle tracking via sequence numbers and correlation IDs, while typed capability descriptors enable compile-time validation and automatic test generation. This engineering shift, detailed by developer Tamiz, aims to make multi-agent systems reliable, auditable, and production-ready rather than demo-grade.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How to Configure Proxmox HA Cluster Quorum to Prevent Split-Brain Failures

A properly configured quorum is critical to the stability of a Proxmox High Availability cluster, as misconfiguration can lead to split-brain scenarios, data loss, and unintended VM duplication. An HA cluster requires at least three physical nodes communicating via Corosync, with quorum defined as the minimum votes needed for the cluster to make decisions. A three-node setup provides a 2-of-3 quorum considered a production gold standard, ensuring the cluster remains operational even if one node fails. Split-brain occurs when network partitions cause cluster segments to independently believe they hold quorum, potentially starting the same VM twice on separate partitions. Key preventive measures include redundant network switches, correct corosync.conf configuration, and regular quorum status checks using the pvecm status command.

Infrastructure Scanners Can Silently Misreport S3 Security Due to Failed API Calls · ShortSingh