SShortSingh.
Back to feed

India Rejects Gurpatwant Singh Pannun's US Lawsuit as Fabricated and Malicious

0
·1 views

India's External Affairs Ministry has firmly rejected a lawsuit filed in the United States by Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, whom New Delhi labels a Khalistani terrorist. Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal stated that India strongly objects to the allegations made against its senior officials. He also rejected the lawsuit itself, characterising the claims as fabricated and malicious. The statement was issued by the ministry in New Delhi, and the ministry has not elaborated on the specific allegations in the reported remarks.

Read the full story at NDTV

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
IndiaNDTV ·

Nvidia Faces Succession Questions as Board Weighs Leadership Future Around CEO Jensen Huang

Nvidia's board of directors is reportedly facing pressure to examine the company's succession planning around chief executive Jensen Huang. Huang's leadership has been widely viewed as central to Nvidia's growth. His considerable influence within the company makes such a review difficult to carry out. The situation raises questions about how the firm will maintain its direction once Huang steps back. The article frames the matter as a potential succession challenge rather than a confirmed leadership change.

0
IndiaTimes of India ·

Suryakumar Yadav says post-T20 World Cup phase was tough, credits daughter and wife for support

Suryakumar Yadav has acknowledged that being dropped after the 2026 T20 World Cup was a difficult period for him. He said the arrival of his daughter helped him get through the challenging stretch. The cricketer also credited his wife, Devisha, with helping him regain his passion for the game. His immediate target, he said, is to lead Mumbai to the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy title.

0
IndiaNDTV ·

Supreme Court Says Government Has Wide Power to Retire Employees in Public Interest

The Supreme Court has ruled that the government holds broad authority to compulsorily retire employees in the public interest. According to the court, an employee cannot contest such a retirement simply by pointing out that a colleague with a similar service record was permitted to remain in service. The observation clarifies that comparison with other staff members alone does not form a sufficient ground for challenge. The ruling reinforces the discretion available to authorities in managing public service personnel.

India Rejects Gurpatwant Singh Pannun's US Lawsuit as Fabricated and Malicious · ShortSingh