How to Spot Real ML Agencies vs. API Wrappers When Hiring in 2026
As of 2026, the gap between agencies claiming to offer custom machine learning and those actually delivering it has grown significantly, with most pitches amounting to API integrations rather than genuine model training. True custom ML involves training models on proprietary data, fine-tuning foundation models with measurable gains, or building specialised architectures — not simply chaining LLM calls or wrapping GPT APIs in a workflow. Operators evaluating agencies should request evidence of shipped production models, a structured data audit process, and a rigorous offline evaluation methodology that includes time-aware cross-validation. A reliable agency will conduct a discovery phase to assess data quality, schema, and leakage risks before quoting any model work. Structuring engagements as two-phase pilots with an exit option after phase one helps ensure financial and technical risk falls on the agency rather than the client.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.


Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in