SShortSingh.
TopTechnologyAI & MLStartupsProgrammingScienceBusinessFinanceCrypto & Web3World
Back to feed
Programming

How to Build a CI/CD Pipeline That Makes Deployments a Non-Event

0
·1 views

A well-structured CI/CD pipeline automates the path from code commit to production, removing the need for manual intervention at deployment time. The process should run staged checks in order of speed — linting, type checks, tests, and build — keeping total runtime under ten minutes to maintain developer trust. Teams should build a single deployable artifact, such as a Docker image, and promote it unchanged across environments to eliminate staging-vs-production discrepancies. Safe rollout strategies like blue-green deployments or canary releases help limit the blast radius of a bad release, while a fast, rehearsed rollback command ensures quick recovery when failures occur. Even a minimal setup combining automated tests with one-command deploys can significantly change how confidently a team ships software.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Apache Iceberg V3 Deletion Vectors Explained: Faster, Cheaper Row-Level Deletes

Deleting individual rows in a data lakehouse is technically complex because object stores like Amazon S3 treat files as immutable — they can be written and read but never edited in place. Apache Iceberg V2 addressed this with 'delete files,' a merge-on-read mechanism that logged which rows to ignore rather than rewriting entire data files. While this made row-level changes practical, it shifted processing costs to readers and degraded performance under heavy workloads. Iceberg V3 introduced 'deletion vectors,' a more efficient approach that improves read performance and scales better under pressure. The shift from delete files to deletion vectors represents a significant architectural refinement that expands the range of workloads a lakehouse can reliably support.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community
0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

How GCC Handles Function Returns and Stack Memory Allocation on x86-64

A technical deep-dive explains how GCC manages stack memory and function return values during compilation on x86-64 architecture. The article covers three return mechanisms defined by the System V AMD64 ABI: returning scalar values via a single register, returning small structs across multiple registers, and returning large structs via a hidden pointer supplied by the caller. Stack memory allocation is handled through standard x86 instructions, where GCC adjusts the stack pointer register to reserve space for a function's local variables. The piece also explains the role of the endbr64 instruction, a hardware-level security checkpoint from Intel and AMD's Control-flow Enforcement Technology that prevents Jump-Oriented Programming attacks. Sample C code and GCC disassembly output via objdump are used throughout to illustrate each concept.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community
0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Developer Solves FastAPI Stale Connection and IPv6 Routing Issues with Supabase

A FastAPI developer encountered a ConnectTimeout 401 error after leaving a locally hosted web app idle, caused by the server silently closing inactive connections while the client-side pool remained unaware. Debugging revealed that Supabase's edge pooler drops idle connections after a timeout, a problem known as the stale singleton connection issue. The developer addressed this by implementing idle-time calculation and retry logic to re-establish connections when inactivity exceeded the server timeout. However, a second issue emerged: supabase-py uses httpx, which does not support Happy Eyeballs, a mechanism that falls back from IPv6 to IPv4 automatically. Since most Pakistani ISPs do not route IPv6, the connection defaulted to a failing IPv6 attempt with no automatic IPv4 fallback, requiring a manual workaround.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community
0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Open-source CLI correctly flags Cal.com billing webhooks as unconfirmed — and it was right

A developer tested DevTime, a local CLI tool that scans code repositories for evidence of specific features, against the open-source Cal.com scheduling platform. The tool flagged billing webhooks at low confidence despite Cal.com being a Stripe-integrated SaaS, which initially appeared to be an error. Manual inspection revealed that the webhook file in the repo is actually a stub returning a 404, with real billing webhook logic reserved for the enterprise edition. The scanner's refusal to confirm the feature without behavioral evidence proved to be the correct call. However, the tool did miss real background job infrastructure and admin permission surfaces present in the codebase, highlighting areas for improvement.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community