SShortSingh.
Back to feed

How Polymarket Order Book Data and Chainlink TWAP Can Estimate Fair BTC Probabilities

0
·3 views

A quantitative research approach proposes combining Polymarket order-book prices with Chainlink TWAP data to better estimate fair probabilities in short-term Bitcoin prediction markets. Polymarket's BTC Up/Down markets resolve based on Chainlink's BTC/USD Data Stream rather than arbitrary spot exchange prices, making the two price signals distinct and non-interchangeable. The framework separates market-implied probability derived from order-book data from the underlying reference price supplied by Chainlink, treating them as complementary layers of information. A simplified Black-Scholes binary option model is suggested as a research tool to generate a probability distribution, which can then be compared against the market price to identify a potential model edge. Researchers caution that the Black-Scholes component depends heavily on volatility assumptions and should not be treated as a definitive oracle for market resolution outcomes.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingHacker News ·

Pew Research Center outlines its guidelines for AI use in research work

Pew Research Center has published a transparency statement explaining how it does and does not use artificial intelligence in its work. The organization outlined specific boundaries and approved applications for AI tools within its research processes. The disclosure reflects growing pressure on research institutions to be open about AI's role in producing findings. By clarifying these boundaries, Pew aims to maintain public trust in the credibility and methodology of its studies.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Developer Builds Incident-Recovery Agent That Validates Memory Before Applying Fixes

A developer built AfterTrace, a command-line incident-recovery tool, after their AI agent nearly applied a wrong fix by relying on a past solution for a similar-looking but different bug. The agent had previously fixed a failing search query by correcting a misconfigured alias, but in a repeat incident the alias was already correct and the real culprit was a stale cache. To prevent such errors, AfterTrace follows a principle where recalled fixes only guide what to investigate first, not what to change. Before applying any stored fix, the agent re-checks the current live state to confirm the fix still applies, rejecting it outright if conditions have changed. The developer plans to expand fault-type coverage and log rejected recalls so the agent can also learn from its own corrections.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Google's goto Redirect Wraps Organic Links in US, Affecting Analytics Not Rankings

Google has nearly completed rolling out google.com/goto redirect wrappers for organic search result links in the United States as of late August 2026, adding an intermediary Google URL before users reach their destination. The change does not alter how pages are ranked; it only modifies the click path a user travels before landing on a website. However, the extra redirect hop can cause discrepancies in analytics tools, rank trackers, and SERP APIs that do not correctly follow the redirect to its final destination URL. Google Search Console is unaffected in terms of its core reporting logic, as it already groups performance data by the final resolved URL after redirects. Site owners are advised to audit their measurement workflows — comparing GA4, Search Console, and third-party SEO platforms — to ensure each system is consistently recording the final destination rather than the intermediary Google URL.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Apache Foundation Completes AI-Powered Security Scans Across 230 Repositories

The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) conducted full security scans across 230 of its code repositories during a three-day window in August 2026. The work was carried out jointly by the ASF Security and ASF Tooling teams under the Foundation's Responsible AI Initiative, using Anthropic's Claude Mythos 5 via a program called Project Glasswing. The effort was partly motivated by a rise in low-quality AI-generated vulnerability reports reaching open-source projects, prompting ASF to run its own rigorous, context-aware scans internally. Scanning was powered by an automated pipeline built on the Gofannon agent platform, evaluating code against the OWASP Application Security Verification Standard across three model tiers of increasing analytical depth. Findings are now being disclosed to the respective project teams through official ASF channels, with remediation already underway, and the initiative was made possible in part by a donation from Anthropic.