SShortSingh.
Back to feed

How One Team Built Automated LLM Eval Pipelines After 500 Users Got Hallucinated Responses

0
·1 views

A development team discovered the cost of informal AI testing after their RAG-based customer support assistant served hallucinated responses — including fabricated policies and competitor data — to over 500 users before the issue was caught. The incident, traced to a test process that amounted to reading a handful of answers and giving a thumbs up, prompted a complete overhaul of their evaluation approach. The team subsequently built a production-grade evaluation pipeline incorporating multiple automated judges covering faithfulness, instruction following, JSON schema validation, and safety checks. The system integrates directly into CI/CD workflows to block code merges that degrade response quality, and uses a versioned golden dataset for regression detection. According to the team, the automated pipeline now catches 92% of hallucinations before any changes reach deployment.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Swift Classes Use Reference Types, Meaning Copies Share the Same Data

In Swift, classes are reference types, so assigning a class instance to a new variable does not create an independent copy of the data. Both variables point to the same memory location, meaning a change made through one variable is reflected in the other. This contrasts with structs, which are value types that produce fully independent copies when assigned. The reference-type behavior is intentional and useful for managing shared state across multiple parts of an app, such as a user profile displayed on several screens. Developers who need a true independent copy of a class instance must manually implement a copy method that initializes a new instance with the same values.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Popular JSON minifiers silently corrupt large integers above JavaScript's safe limit

A flaw in widely used JSON minifiers causes large integers — such as database or Snowflake IDs — to be silently altered when processed through JavaScript's JSON.parse and JSON.stringify methods. Any integer exceeding Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER (9007199254740991) can lose precision without triggering an error, producing output that is syntactically valid but numerically incorrect. This can cause hard-to-trace bugs when corrupted IDs are used in database lookups, API calls, or foreign key references downstream. The root cause is the parse-then-stringify round-trip approach most minifiers rely on, which converts JSON numbers into JavaScript floating-point values. The recommended fix is to minify JSON at the character level — stripping only whitespace — so number literals are preserved exactly as written in the original input.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

DeepShrink lets users compress video to an exact file size with one command

DeepShrink is an open-source command-line tool written in Rust that compresses video and audio files to a user-specified size limit without uploading files to external servers. The tool works by driving ffmpeg under the hood, automatically calculating the required bitrate and running a two-pass H.264/H.265 encode to guarantee the output meets the target size. Users simply specify a file and a size limit, such as 8 MB for Discord, and DeepShrink handles all technical parameters including codec selection and audio bitrate. It also supports an optional VMAF quality floor to prevent over-compression, and the original file is never modified unless the user explicitly requests it. DeepShrink is available via Homebrew on macOS or through Rust's cargo package manager, with cross-platform ffmpeg installation required for the latter.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Developer Launches 'hallint' to Catch Security Bugs Introduced by AI Coding Tools

A developer has released hallint, a free open-source static analysis tool designed to detect security vulnerabilities commonly introduced by AI coding assistants such as GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and ChatGPT. Unlike traditional linters built for human-written code, hallint targets recurring AI-specific failure patterns including hardcoded secrets, SQL injection via template literals, missing authentication middleware, and overly permissive CORS settings. The tool supports JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python codebases and ships with 11 targeted security rules spanning critical, high, and medium severity levels. It uses three detection layers — regex matching, AST analysis, and an optional LLM-based semantic review via providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, or a local Ollama instance. hallint is available as both a CLI tool and a TypeScript library that can be integrated into existing development workflows.

How One Team Built Automated LLM Eval Pipelines After 500 Users Got Hallucinated Responses · ShortSingh