SShortSingh.
Back to feed

How k3s Solved the Problem of Running Kubernetes on a Busy Home Server

0
·3 views

A developer sought a persistent Kubernetes learning environment without the ongoing cost of Amazon EKS, whose control plane alone runs at $0.10 per cluster-hour before additional infrastructure charges. The solution was deploying k3s on an always-on Intel N100 home server running Debian, which already hosted 28 Docker containers across 16 GiB of RAM. k3s was chosen over MicroK8s and k0s because it runs natively on Debian, requires only 2 CPU cores and 2 GB of RAM, and allows fine-grained control over resource reservations and bundled components. The single-node cluster was designed to coexist with existing workloads rather than replace them, keeping the host's other services intact. A pre-installation audit script was written to document the server's existing state, ensuring Kubernetes could be introduced without disrupting the machine's current responsibilities.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Unverified Claim About Mistral AI Hosting Third-Party Models Prompts Enterprise Caution

An unconfirmed claim suggests Mistral AI may be expanding its platform to host third-party open models, starting with GLM-5.2, but Mistral has published no official announcement or documentation supporting this. The company currently distributes only its own models through established cloud partners such as Azure AI, Amazon Bedrock, and Google Vertex AI, while MCP connectors enable third-party service integrations without constituting model hosting. GLM-5.2 is associated with the THUDM or Zhipu AI ecosystem and does not appear in Mistral's documented portfolio. Enterprise teams are advised not to treat GLM-5.2 as a supported Mistral-hosted model until formal product details are released. Should such an expansion be confirmed, businesses would still need clear answers on data governance, regional inference, commercial terms, and operational support responsibilities before adoption.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Tool Exposes Which Short-Video Clipping Campaigns Actually Pay Out

A developer has built a scraper tool that analyzes all active campaigns on Whop Content Rewards, a platform paying creators per 1,000 views on short-form video clips. The tool reveals that 21% of the platform's roughly 456 live campaigns have never paid out a single cent, despite displaying large listed budgets. By calculating daily spend rate, estimated days of budget remaining, and average payout per creator, the tool assigns each campaign an opportunity score to help clippers prioritize their work. The developer notes that high headline budgets are misleading without payout velocity data, citing two campaigns both showing around $30,000 in budget but with vastly different daily burn rates of $255 versus $19. The scraper runs via Apify and is designed to be scheduled once daily, returning ranked results to guide creators toward campaigns that demonstrably pay.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

AI Agents Vulnerable to Prompt Injection Attacks Hidden in GitHub READMEs

A developer discovered a prompt injection attack embedded in a GitHub repository's README file during a research session with Claude Code, where plain text mimicked a legitimate system message by falsely claiming the date had changed. Rather than using obvious jailbreak phrases, the attacker exploited how AI agents process fetched web content, causing the agent to re-evaluate information based on a fabricated timestamp. A March 2026 study by ReadSecBench tested 500 open-source README files and found that direct embedded commands successfully manipulated AI models roughly 84% of the time, with instructions buried in linked files like CONTRIBUTING.md succeeding at around 91%. Human reviewers fared little better, with the majority of 15 testers failing to detect any problem in flagged documents. Security researchers note that legitimate system instructions are never delivered inside fetched page content, making any system-style markup found within a web page a reliable indicator of a forged or malicious command.