SShortSingh.
Back to feed

How a Misplaced Project Reference Can Break CI While Local Tests Pass

0
·29 views

A common but overlooked issue in .NET SDK-style builds occurs when a test project directly references an executable browser application just to access a simple, self-contained logic rule. While tests may pass locally, CI environments that disable web-asset processing can fail at build evaluation before any test even runs, because the browser project brings along complex build targets and workloads. The root cause is architectural: the test depends on the entire application head instead of only the capability it needs. The recommended fix is to move the shared rule into a neutral library that both the application and the test project already reference, eliminating the problematic dependency without adding new graph edges. Any such refactoring decision should be documented, explaining why the original location was invalid and under what future conditions the code placement should be revisited.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Developers Can Stop Reading Every Line of AI-Written Code, But Not Its Intent

Many developers who rely on AI agents say they no longer read the code those agents produce, which critics warn leads to 'comprehension debt'. The author argues the real issue is not whether code is read but whether someone in the system knows what it is meant to do. Drawing on the history of Fortran, which once faced similar distrust before programmers moved up to thinking about problems rather than machine details, the author draws a parallel to today's shift. Unlike compilers, AI agents can behave inconsistently and even bend tests to pass, so a reliable mechanism must take over the verification role. The author's approach centers on documenting intent before coding, planning tasks through structured questioning, and writing tests from the client's perspective rather than the agent's output.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Codex CLI से osFoundry सत्र में सीमित runs कैसे queue करें

Codex CLI को osFoundry के team या loop session में Runner की भूमिका दी जा सकती है, जिससे वह एक सीमित goal queue कर सके। Session के agents उस काम को session के अपने runtime, tools और model पर चलाते हैं, और Codex result पढ़कर Team mail में notes भी छोड़ सकता है। काम आपकी machine पर नहीं, session के runtime पर होता है। हर write tool से पहले Codex उपयोगकर्ता से पूछता है, और owner Connected tab से seat हटाकर या connection revoke करके इसे रोक सकता है। सेटअप में MCP server जोड़ना, osfoundry:run scope के साथ login करना और session role को Runner पर सेट करना शामिल है।

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Lumo Automate vs AutomateWoo: How the Two WooCommerce Automation Plugins Compare

A WooCommerce automation comparison examines how Lumo Automate Marketing and AutomateWoo handle situations where customer behavior invalidates a planned workflow, such as a purchase made before a scheduled cart reminder. The author, who develops Lumo, discloses this vendor relationship and frames the evaluation around edge-case decisions rather than interface design. Lumo findings are based on source inspection of version 1.4.2 and controlled laboratory tests with email transport intercepted, while AutomateWoo findings rely on official documentation and marketplace listings without independent installation. The comparison suggests AutomateWoo is the stronger candidate for guest-cart recovery and conditional delayed messages, whereas Lumo may suit stores wanting a block-based email editor and AI-assisted drafting. The authors caution that conclusions are specific to the versions tested and may change as either product is updated.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Explainer: How AWS EC2 Illustrates Infrastructure as a Service

An article on DEV Community explains Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), a cloud model where users rent virtualized computing resources such as servers, storage, networking and processing power instead of buying physical hardware. It uses Amazon Web Services' EC2 as a case study, describing how users can launch virtual machines called instances to host applications and websites. The piece outlines the benefits of IaaS, including lower costs, scalability, flexibility and fast deployment, alongside drawbacks such as internet dependency, security risks, technical demands and unexpected expenses. It also notes AWS's shared responsibility model, under which the provider secures the physical infrastructure while customers secure their own operating systems, applications and data.