How a Formal Change Request Process Protects Agency Margins After Scope Shifts
A developer's Reddit post highlighted a common agency dilemma: a client requested major feature redesigns midway through a project that had already been formally approved and scoped. Unlike gradual scope creep, post-approval structural changes create a breakdown in the contract relationship, as clients often view a signed agreement as a purchase entitling them to an evolving ideal product. Without a formal change request process in place, these disputes become personal and adversarial, putting agencies in the position of appearing uncooperative rather than professional. Experts recommend that agencies present scope in tiered variants during the proposal stage and transparently explain cost drivers so clients understand the complexity behind seemingly simple changes. Including a change request clause in every contract — even if rarely invoked — signals professionalism and provides a neutral framework for evaluating the cost, timeline, and risk of any post-approval modifications.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in