Governance Gaps: Actions Outside the Tool Registry and Who Owns Them
A events table received rows from two paths: an AI assistant calling a registered tool, and a plain HTTP endpoint that bypasses the tool registry and the AI side-effect ledger. The author argues that governance should be judged by which execution paths were verified, not by how many tools are registered. The runtime registers 61 tools, but external MCP tools appear in a separate admin catalogue requiring higher permissions, leaving auditors with an incomplete view. The gate treats unregistered tools as a matter for the executor, so passing the gate does not confirm registration. The author also cites an earlier mistake in which a hand-maintained metadata table drifted from the live tool set, and recommends checking the registry against actual entry points.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.



Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in