SShortSingh.
Back to feed

Four Database Security Controls Explained: TDE, Masking, Redaction, and Vault

0
·1 views

A technical article by Abhilash Kumar Bhattaram outlines four distinct database security controls — Transparent Data Encryption (TDE), Data Masking, Data Redaction, and Database Vault — arguing that each solves a different compliance problem at a different stage of a data's lifecycle. A common audit failure occurs when organizations treat encryption alone as a complete data-protection strategy, leaving gaps such as developers accessing live PII in test environments or support staff viewing unredacted sensitive fields. The article identifies nine recurring compliance pain points, including unprotected backup files and no single accountable owner for data protection across DBA, application, and InfoSec teams. It maps each problem to a specific technical or organizational control, referencing regulatory frameworks such as RBI, IRDAI, and India's DPDP Act. The author emphasizes that the confusion between these controls is largely a language and ownership problem before it becomes a technical one, and that clarity on which control answers which audit question is often harder than deploying the control itself.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Log in to join the discussion and vote.

Log in

Related stories

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Key design elements to complete before Google Play's 14-day closed test

Google Play requires developers to complete specific design assets — including an app icon, feature graphic, screenshots, and store descriptions — before a closed test can even begin. Beyond these mandatory elements, experts recommend having onboarding flows, error states, and empty states fully polished, since real testers will encounter them from day one. A built-in feedback mechanism, such as an in-app button or shake-to-report feature, is also advised, as it can increase tester response rates five to ten times compared to email follow-ups. Rough UI during the closed test risks skewing feedback toward surface-level issues rather than meaningful product insights, and low engagement can reset the 14-day counter. Developers are encouraged to ship three to five design fixes during the test window, as testers who see their reported issues addressed tend to engage significantly more.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Developer Updates Safi Budget App With Kenyan Shilling Support, Deploys Live

A developer at Zone01Kisumu completed a late-night coding session focused on updating and deploying Safi Budget, a personal finance application built on the 50/30/20 budgeting framework. The key update involved switching the app's default currency from Euros to Kenyan Shillings to better serve local users' financial tracking needs. The changes were successfully deployed to a live environment during the same session. Safi Budget is designed to help users manage their finances using the popular 50/30/20 budget allocation model.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Why Well-Intentioned Engineering Decisions Often Create More Problems

Overengineering is difficult to spot because it typically resembles careful, responsible design rather than unnecessary complexity. Developers often build elaborate systems in response to past project failures, trying to anticipate future requirements that may never materialise. When imagined needs receive the same architectural weight as real ones, a simple feature can balloon into a complex framework, making even minor changes costly and time-consuming. Premature abstractions compound the problem — code that appears reusable often accumulates flags and workarounds as new use cases diverge, concentrating complexity rather than reducing it. The core lesson is that thinking about the future is sound practice, but building for it before there is concrete evidence tends to create immediate friction instead of preventing future pain.

0
ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Developer Guide: Building a Full Crypto Payment Module for SaaS Applications

A technical article on DEV Community outlines how developers can build a reusable crypto payment module for SaaS platforms, going beyond a simple payment button. The module is designed to handle the full payment lifecycle, including invoice generation, plan activation, webhook verification, grace periods, and payment history tracking. The guide uses OxaPay as a reference crypto payment infrastructure, citing its support for SDKs in PHP, Python, and Laravel. The target audience includes indie SaaS founders, micro-SaaS builders, AI tool developers, and agencies serving international customers who prefer crypto or stablecoin payments. The core argument is that developers who package this as a complete billing solution offer significantly more value than those offering basic payment integration.

Four Database Security Controls Explained: TDE, Masking, Redaction, and Vault · ShortSingh