Five Self-Hosted WAFs on GitHub Compared: Detection Rates, False Positives, and Setup
A 2026 comparison of five open-source, self-hosted web application firewalls (WAFs) available on GitHub evaluates them on detection accuracy, false positive rates, ease of setup, and community support. SafeLine leads with a 71.65% detection rate and just 0.07% false positives, deploying via a single command with a built-in dashboard. BunkerWeb combines NGINX, ModSecurity, and OWASP CRS with a modern GUI, though its false positive rate can reach 17.58% without extensive tuning. Coraza, an OWASP Go project, offers full CRS v4 compatibility and multi-proxy integration but lacks a built-in UI. Newer entrant Pandawaf, built on Cloudflare's Rust-based Pingora library, delivers sub-millisecond latency and 644-plus built-in rules, while CrowdSec contributes crowd-sourced IP reputation blocking alongside a lighter WAF component.
This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion and vote.
Log in