Filament 5 vs Laravel Nova: Key Differences to Guide Your 2026 Choice

·3 views

Filament and Laravel Nova are two leading tools for building admin panels in Laravel, but they follow distinct philosophies. Filament is free and open source, built on Livewire, and now boasts over 200 community plugins along with native multi-tenancy support in its version 5 release. Nova, developed and maintained by the official Laravel team, requires a paid license per project and offers tighter integration with first-party Laravel packages like Cashier and Scout. Filament suits freelancers and budget-conscious teams due to zero licensing costs and rapid feature development, while Nova appeals to larger organizations that prioritize official support, stability, and Vue.js-based frontend customization. The right choice ultimately depends on project budget, team skill set, and how much the development environment values stability versus frequent updates.

Read the full story at DEV Community

This is an AI-generated summary. ShortSingh links to the original source for the complete article.

Discussion (0)

Small Programming Tricks

Article URL: https://will-keleher.com/posts/small-programming-tricks-matter/ Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49729000 Points: 3 # Comments: 0

0 comments Read more at Hacker News

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Developer builds free browser-based motion design studio with no account required

A developer has built AtomCut, a free, browser-based motion design studio that started as a simple text animation tool and evolved into a full-featured platform. The tool runs entirely offline without requiring an account, and supports keyframe animation, watercolour painting, motion tracking, auto-captions, and export to MP4, GIF, SVG, and Lottie formats. Its architecture is built around a single pure rendering function and a versioned JSON document format, meaning the preview and export renderers are identical and old project files remain fully compatible. The developer credits a clean separation between animation logic and UI code as the key architectural decision that allowed features to expand without proportional growth in complexity. The project, whose original folder is still named 'typomation', reached schema version 71 while maintaining backward compatibility with files from its earliest builds.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Go web scraper Cinder rebrands as Tomoshibi with monorepo restructure

Developer Michael Obele has renamed his open-source Go-based web scraper, Cinder, to Tomoshibi — a Japanese word meaning lamp light — citing poor searchability and name collisions with other projects. The tool, which converts HTML into clean markdown for use with large language models, retains all existing API endpoints and functionality with no breaking changes. The rebrand also consolidates three previously separate repositories into a single monorepo containing the API, MCP server, and Svelte web playground. Existing users need only two lines of code to migrate, and old GitHub URLs, Docker tags, and environment variables continue to work as redirects or fallbacks. The project benchmarks at roughly 560 requests per second with a median latency of 11 milliseconds in self-hosted testing.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community

ProgrammingDEV Community ·

Third-Party Listicles Drive 85% of AI Citations in GEO Experiments, Study Finds

Two generative engine optimization experiments published by Search Engine Land on September 14, 2026, found that external editorial sources — not brand-owned content — were the primary drivers of early AI search visibility. In a 30-day cold-start test for a SaaS link-building agency with no prior AI presence, third-party listicles accounted for 85.8% of citation mentions across six AI platforms, while the brand's own listicle contributed just 14% and PR a negligible 0.2%. A parallel test tracking an established consultant brand across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity logged 775 citation events and similarly found external listicles to be a leading source, with PR and listicles reinforcing each other. Researchers also observed that roughly half of cited sources dropped out within 30 days, indicating that AI visibility can be unstable and may not persist after a single placement. The findings suggest that for brands with little or no AI-search presence, earning placements on authoritative third-party sources is a more effective early strategy than publishing additional owned content.

0 comments Read more at DEV Community